4.8 Article

Cerebral Organoids Recapitulate Epigenomic Signatures of the Human Fetal Brain

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 3369-3384

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3034]
  3. Austrian Academy of Sciences
  4. Austrian Science Fund [I_1281-B19, Z_153_B09]
  5. European Research Council (ERC)
  6. Marie Curie post-doctoral fellowship
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1201/9]
  8. MRC [MC_UP_1201/9] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Z153] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  10. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [Z 153] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1201/9] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells recapitulate the early three-dimensional organization of the human brain, but whether they establish the epigenomic and transcriptional programs essential for brain development is unknown. We compared epigenomic and regulatory features in cerebral organoids and human fetal brain, using genome-wide, base resolution DNA methylome and transcriptome sequencing. Transcriptomic dynamics in organoids faithfully modeled gene expression trajectories in early-to-mid human fetal brains. We found that early non-CG methylation accumulation at super-enhancers in both fetal brain and organoids marks forthcoming transcriptional repression in the fully developed brain. Demethylated regions (74% of 35,627) identified during organoid differentiation overlapped with fetal brain regulatory elements. Interestingly, pericentromeric repeats showed wide-spread demethylation in multiple types of in vitro human neural differentiation models but not in fetal brain. Our study reveals that organoids recapitulate many epigenomic features of mid-fetal human brain and also identified novel non-CG methylation signatures of brain development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据