3.8 Article

Comparative study lumbar plexus block and lumbar erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain relief after proximal femoral nail for proximal femoral fractures

期刊

SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 147-154

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_630_22

关键词

Acute pain; erector spinae; femur; fracture; lumbar plexus; nerve block; regional anesthesia; ultrasonography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) and lumbar plexus block (LPB) for pain management and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing proximal femoral nail (PFN) for proximal femoral fractures (PFF). The results showed that LESPB group had better average pain scores over 24 hours, with a lower proportion of patients requiring opioids compared to the LPB group. Additionally, the time for the first request of parenteral analgesia was longer in the LESPB group, and there were a few cases of quadriceps weakness, but no incidences of hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications.
Background: The clinical outcomes (time to ambulation, length of stay, and home discharge) after proximal femoral nail (PFN) for proximal femoral fractures (PFF) is dependent on successful pain management. Currently, the lumbar erector spinae plane block (LESPB) is in vogue and is associated with favorable outcomes in the postoperative period. Our study aimed to evaluate whether a LESPB provided equivalent analgesia and clinical outcomes as compared to LPB in PFN for PFF.Material and Methods: We compared LPBs [L] with LESPBs [E], with 30 patients in each group, performed from June 2020 to June 2021 for PFN in PFF's. The primary outcome of this study was the average NRS pain scores over 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at different time points over 24 hours, opioid consumption between the groups at 24 hours postoperatively, time for request of first parenteral analgesia, quadriceps weakness and adverse events.Results: The average pain scores over 24 hours were better in the LESPB group as compared to the LPB group (p = 0.02). Further, only n = 5 (30%) of patients in the LESPB group required opioids, while n = 13 (43.333%) of patients in the LPB group required opioids. Moreover, the median time for request of first parenteral analgesia was 615 (480-975) minutes, weakness of quadriceps function occurred in 2 patients in the L group, which recovered at 3(rd) and 5(th )month, respectively, with no incidences of hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications.Conclusions: This trial demonstrated that single bolus LESPB is superior to LPB in terms of analgesic outcomes, has low adverse events, and is an agreeable substitute for patients with PFF undergoing a PFN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据