4.5 Review

Collagen supplementation in skin and orthopedic diseases: A review of the literature

期刊

HELIYON
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14961

关键词

Skin; Joint; Bone metabolism; Senescence; Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Collagen is a major component of the extracellular matrix in the skin and articular cartilage, affecting the body's mechanical and tissue formation properties. Literature review shows that collagen supplementation can improve skin conditions and orthopedic ailments by reducing wrinkles, increasing elasticity and hydration, and enhancing bone strength and joint mobility. This indicates the potential economic and health benefits of collagen derived from food industry by-products.
Collagen is one of the main components of the extracellular matrix of the dermis and articular cartilage and influences the body's mechanical, organizational, and tissue formation properties. Produced from food industry by-products, it is considered a nutraceutical product widely used an ingredient or supplement in food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. This study aimed to conduct a literature review on the scientific evidence regarding the beneficial effects collagen consumption in the treatment of skin and orthopedic diseases. Literature data have shown that hydrolyzed collagen supplementation promotes skin changes, such as decreased wrinkle formation; increased skin elasticity; increased hydration; increased collagen content, density, and synthesis, which are factors closely associated with aging-related skin damage. Regarding orthopedic changes, collagen supplementation increases bone strength, density, and mass; improves joint stiffness/mobility, and functionality; and reduces pain. These aspects are associated with bone loss due to aging and damage caused by strenuous physical activity. Thus, this review addresses the economic and health potential of this source of amino acids and bioactive peptides extracted from food industry by-products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据