4.6 Article

Ultrafast multiexciton dynamics in molecular systems: Inclusion of exciton-exciton annihilation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.134301

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we simulate the exciton-exciton annihilation (EEA) process in dye molecular aggregates with laser pulse excitation using reduced density matrix theory. We highlight the importance of quantum coherence effects and discuss the factors affecting the EEA process. Our results suggest that coherent excitation at the lowest energy level in J aggregates enhances the efficiency of the EEA process.
We report simulations of exciton-exciton annihilation (EEA) in dye molecular aggregates with explicit laser pulse excitation in the framework of reduced density matrix theory. We use a supramolecular complex model Hamiltonian, in which each monomer of an aggregate is described by three electronic levels. An expectation value approximation is used to avoid the large amount of matrix elements for various exciton configuration distributions in molecular aggregates. Quantum fluctuations truncation is applied to derive the closed equations of motion for single- and two-site functions. Using these equations, we simulate the laser pulse driven EEA dynamics, and compare it with rate equations to highlight the importance of quantum coherence effects. We also discuss the effects of the aggregate configuration, the molecular transition dipoles and the duration of laser pulses on EEA. Furthermore, we analyze the relation between the coherence time of fusion and the annihilation process. Our study indicates that EEA process is more efficient for coherent excitation at the lowest energy level in J aggregates. Our simulation of the normalized population of the first excited state for various field amplitudes can qualitatively reproduce time-resolved experimental emission spectra. This confirms that the fundamental description of laser pulse induced EEA is correct within our model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据