4.7 Article

Roxarsone induces angiogenesis via PI3K/Akt signaling

期刊

CELL AND BIOSCIENCE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13578-016-0119-1

关键词

Angiogenesis; Roxarsone; PI3K/Akt signaling; Vascular endothelial cell; B16-F10 xenograft model

资金

  1. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  2. Talented Person Project of Yangzhou University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: 3-Nitro-4-hydroxy phenyl arsenic acid, roxarsone, is widely used as an organic arsenic feed additive for livestock and poultry, which may increase the level of arsenic in the environment and the risk of exposure to arsenic in human. Little information is focused on the angiogenesis roxarsone-induced and its mechanism at present. This paper aims to study the role of PI3K/Akt signaling in roxarsone-induced angiogenesis in rat vascular endothelial cells and a mouse B16-F10 melanoma xenograft model. Results: The results showed that treatment with 0.1-10.0 mu mol/L roxarsone resulted in an increase in the OD rate in the MTT assay, the number of BrdU-positive cells in the proliferation assay, the migration distance in the scratch test and the number of meshes in tube formation assay. Further, treatment with 1.0 mu mol/L roxarsone was associated with significantly higher phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt and expression of VEGF than the control treatment. The PI3K inhibitor was found to significantly combat the effects of 1.0 mu mol/L roxarsone. Furthermore, roxarsone treatment was observed to increase the weight and volume of B16-F10 xenografts and VEGF expression and PI3K/Akt phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner, with the 25 mg/kg dose having significant effects. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that roxarsone has the ability to promote growth and tube formation in vascular endothelial cells and the growth of mouse B16-F10 xenografts. Further, the findings also indicate that PI3K/Akt signaling plays a regulatory role in roxarsone-induced angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据