4.7 Article

Comparing the efficiency of solar water treatment: Photovoltaic-LED vs compound parabolic collector photoreactors

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.109332

关键词

Bacterial inactivation; Chemical pollutant oxidation; Solar CPC photoreactor; Solar PV panel; UVA LED; UVC LED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines how to optimize the efficiency of solar light utilization in various UV-based photochemical water treatment processes. The use of sunlight in compound parabolic collector (CPC) photoreactors is compared to using solar energy for electricity generation in photovoltaic (PV) power systems that power LED lighting sources. Seven different solar processes were investigated for chemical oxidation and bacterial inactivation. The results showed that the most efficient process for oxidation of chemicals is PV-UVC LED+H2O2, while the most efficient process for bacterial inactivation is PV-UVC LED+H2O2. The study highlights the need to evaluate the optimal approach in reactor engineering for water-energy applications, considering the current and future improvements in PV and LED technology.
This work analyses how to optimise efficiency in the use of solar light for different UV-based photochemical water treatment processes. The direct use of sunlight in state-of-the-art compound parabolic collector (CPC) photoreactors is compared with the use of solar energy for electricity generation in photovoltaic (PV) power systems to feed LED lighting sources. Seven different solar processes (CPC, PV-UVA LED, PV-UVC LED, CPC+TiO2, CPC+H2O2, PV-UVA LED+TiO2 and PV-UVC LED+H2O2) were investigated, both for the oxidation of chemicals and the inactivation of bacteria. The results showed that, for the oxidation of chemicals, the best photochemical yield (in terms of the use of photons) is achieved by the PV-UVC LED+H2O2 process. However, the low electrical efficiency of current UVC LED sources makes the CPC+TiO2 process the most efficient in the use of solar light. In contrast, for bacterial inactivation, the significantly higher effectiveness of the UVC spectral range in damaging DNA makes the PV-UVC LED+H2O2 the most efficient in the use of sunlight. When costs are considered, the PV-UVA LED+TiO2 may be the most efficient process for chemical oxidation, while the PV-UVC LED+H2O2 process could be the most efficient for bacterial inactivation. These findings highlight the need to evaluate the optimal approach in reactor engineering for applications in the water-energy nexus, since the most efficient process for the use of solar light strongly depends on the electrical efficiency of the available PV and LED technology, which can be expected to be largely improved in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据