4.7 Article

Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis: utility and pitfalls for antibody-negative disease

期刊

LANCET NEUROLOGY
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 529-540

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased awareness of autoimmune encephalitis has led to misdiagnoses and inappropriate use of diagnostic criteria for antibody-negative disease. Misdiagnoses occur due to non-adherence to clinical requirements, inadequate assessment, and limited use of assays. Clinicians should adhere to published criteria and substantiate absence of neural antibodies. Accurate diagnosis will help assess treatment response and outcomes.
Increased awareness of autoimmune encephalitis has led to two unintended consequences: a high frequency of misdiagnoses and the inappropriate use of diagnostic criteria for antibody-negative disease. Misdiagnoses typically occur for three reasons: first, non-adherence to reported clinical requirements for considering a disorder as possible autoimmune encephalitis; second, inadequate assessment of inflammatory changes in brain MRI and CSF; and third, absent or limited use of brain tissue assays along with use of cell-based assays that include only a narrow range of antigens. For diagnosis of possible autoimmune encephalitis and probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis, clinicians should adhere to published criteria for adults and children, focusing particularly on exclusion of alternative disorders. Moreover, for diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis, the absence of neural antibodies in CSF and serum should be well substantiated. Neural antibody testing should use tissue assays along with cell-based assays that include a broad range of antigens. Live neuronal studies in specialised centres can assist in resolving inconsistencies with respect to syndrome-antibody associations. Accurate diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis will identify patients with similar syndromes and biomarkers, which will provide homogeneous populations for future assessments of treatment response and outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据