4.7 Article

Investigation of Excited-State Intramolecular Proton Transfer and Structural Dynamics in Bis-Benzimidazole Derivative (BBM)

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119438

关键词

excited-state intramolecular proton transfer; structural dynamics; transient absorption; femtosecond fluorescence upconversion; femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a bis-benzimidazole derivative (BBM) molecule consisting of two 2-(2 '-hydroxyphenyl) benzimidazole (HBI) halves was synthesized and used as a ratiometric fluorescence sensor for sensitive detection of Cu2+ based on enol-keto excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT). The primary photodynamics of the BBM molecule were investigated using femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy, time-resolved electronic spectroscopies, and quantum chemical calculations. The results showed that ESIPT occurred only in one of the HBI halves with a time constant of 300 fs, followed by rotation of the dihedral angle between the two HBI halves and generation of a planarized BBM-keto* isomer in 3 ps, resulting in a dynamic redshift of BBM-keto* emission.
The bis-benzimidazole derivative (BBM) molecule, consisting of two 2-(2 '-hydroxyphenyl) benzimidazole (HBI) halves, has been synthesized and successfully utilized as a ratiometric fluorescence sensor for the sensitive detection of Cu2+ based on enol-keto excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT). In this study, we strategically implement femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy and several time-resolved electronic spectroscopies, aided by quantum chemical calculations to investigate the detailed primary photodynamics of the BBM molecule. The results demonstrate that the ESIPT from BBM-enol* to BBM-keto* was observed in only one of the HBI halves with a time constant of 300 fs; after that, the rotation of the dihedral angle between the two HBI halves generated a planarized BBM-keto* isomer in 3 ps, leading to a dynamic redshift of BBM-keto* emission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据