4.5 Article

Genome wide analyses reveal the population distinctiveness of the 'Nera del Mela' sheep

期刊

ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 548-559

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2023.2216724

关键词

SNPs; animal genetic resource; sheep; genetic diversity; run of homozygosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Italy has a long history of sheep breeding and Nera del Mela, a sheep genetic resource historically reared in Sicily, possesses a defined genetic structure. The genetic diversity and population structure of Nera del Mela were evaluated using the OvineSNP50K array, revealing a moderate level of variability and the influence of other populations. The findings contribute to the possible official acknowledgement, conservation plan, and preservation of this genomic heritage.
Italy has a long history of sheep breeding and counts several local populations that may represent a unique source of genetic diversity. Among these, Nera del Mela is a sheep genetic resource historically reared in Sicily but not officially recognised as a breed. In this study, we genotyped 36 individuals of Nera del Mela using the OvineSNP50K array, in order to estimate the genetic diversity and evaluate the population structure and relatedness with other Italian sheep breeds. Genetic diversity indices, and inbreeding estimated from runs of homozygosity (F-ROH) revealed a moderate level of variability. Runs of homozygosity islands mapped candidate genes involved in the adaptation to local environment and immune response. Population genetic analyses using different approaches highlighted the hypothesis that this sheep possesses a defined genetic structure, especially if compared with other recognised breeds, despite the influence of other populations such as the Sicilian breeds. Overall, our findings represent a starting point for the possible official acknowledgement of this population, for the creation of a conservation plan, and thus for preserving this genomic heritage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据