3.8 Proceedings Paper

Creating Translucent Event Logs to Improve Process Discovery

期刊

PROCESS MINING WORKSHOPS, ICPM 2022
卷 468, 期 -, 页码 435-447

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-27815-0_32

关键词

Translucent event logs; Robotic process mining; Task mining; Desktop activity mining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Event logs capture information about executed activities, but not about enabled but not executed activities. Translucent event logs contain information on enabled activities. We propose two techniques to increase the availability of translucent event logs. The first technique records system states as snapshots and links them to events, adding information about enabled activities. The second technique uses a process model to add information about enabled activities to existing event logs, improving process discovery.
Event logs capture information about executed activities. However, they do not capture information about activities that could have been performed, i.e., activities that were enabled during a process. Event logs containing information on enabled activities are called translucent event logs. Although it is possible to extract translucent event logs from a running information system, such logs are rarely stored. To increase the availability of translucent event logs, we propose two techniques. The first technique records the system's states as snapshots. These snapshots are stored and linked to events. A user labels patterns that describe parts of the system's state. By matching patterns with snapshots, we can add information about enabled activities. We apply our technique in a small setting to demonstrate its applicability. The second technique uses a process model to add information concerning enabled activities to an existing traditional event log. Data containing enabled activities are valuable for process discovery. Using the information on enabled activities, we can discover more correct models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据