4.6 Article

Synthesis, structural studies and computational evaluation of cyclophanes incorporating imidazole-2-selones

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 13, 期 25, 页码 17282-17296

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ra02913a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We synthesized a series of cyclophanes containing imidazole-2-selone groups and determined their structural behavior through various spectroscopic and crystallographic methods. The cyclophanes showed different conformations depending on the linking groups and their environment. The density functional analysis provided insights into the stability of the compounds and their conformations.
We report new cyclophanes containing imidazole-2-selone groups linked by xylylene rings. A set of imidazole-2-selone cyclophanes is synthesized by reaction corresponding to imidazolium cyclophanes with selenium in the presence of K2CO3. The structural behavior of the new imidazole-2-selone cyclophanes was determined by H-1 and C-13 NMR spectra and X-ray diffraction studies. Cyclophanes incorporating o-xylylene or mesitylene-m-cyclophane linked by selone groups were mutually syn in both the solid state and solution, and the cyclophanes showed a conformation similar to the cone conformation of calix[4]arenes. Cyclophanes incorporating p-xylylene or m-xylylene linked by selone groups showed two conformations in the solution: one mutually syn and the other mutually anti. There was no interconversion for both conformations observed on the NMR timescale. In the solid state, three conformations were detected for the p-xylylene-linked cyclophane: one is mutually syn and the other two are mutually anti and partial cone conformations. In the m-xylylene-linked case, only anti-conformation was characterized in the solid state. A density functional analysis was conducted to interpret the stability of the studied compounds and shed light on their origin. The energy preference analysis is in consistent agreement with the observed geometries and their co-existence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据