4.1 Article

Incidentally Discovered Mucosal Prolapse of the Colon During Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Case Report

期刊

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37958

关键词

benign colon polyp; screening colonoscopy; colonic neoplasm; colonoscopy and polypectomy; mucosal prolapse syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colonic mucosal prolapse syndrome is a rare condition that resembles neoplastic lesions and was incidentally found during colorectal cancer screening in a 65-year-old man. The patient was asymptomatic and had normal physical exam and laboratory test results. Colonoscopy revealed the presence of tubular adenomas and pedunculated polyps suspicious of neoplasms, along with small internal hemorrhoids. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of mucosal prolapse syndrome in the larger polyps, while the smaller polyps were consistent with tubular adenomas. Management involves removing associated polyps and conducting surveillance colonoscopy for monitoring recurrence and early signs of colorectal cancer.
Colonic mucosal prolapse syndrome is a rare type of non-neoplastic non-inflammatory colorectal polyps that can mimic neoplastic lesions. We present a case of a 65-year-old man with mucosal prolapse syndrome, incidentally, discovered during colorectal cancer screening. The patient was asymptomatic, and his physical exam and laboratory test results were unremarkable. During a colonoscopy, the physician removed three small tubular adenomas and two pedunculated polyps suspicious of neoplasms. Retroflexion revealed small internal hemorrhoids. The histology of the larger polyps revealed mucosal prolapse features, while the smaller polyps displayed features consistent with tubular adenomas. Management involves the removal of associated polyps during colonoscopy, followed by surveillance colonoscopy to detect any recurrent polyps or early signs of colorectal cancer. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid unnecessary interventions and ensure appropriate management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据