4.7 Article

A stable 2D luminescent metal-organic framework as a highly sensitive sensor for Fe3+ and Cr2O72-/CrO42- in water

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 25, 期 24, 页码 3539-3547

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ce00370a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reacting H4BDPO with Cd2+ ions, a 2D metal-organic framework (MOF) {[Cd-3(HBDPO)(2)(H2O)(7)]center dot 4H(2)O}(n) (1) was synthesized under solvothermal conditions. The structure of 1 was characterized by various methods, and it was found that it possesses a 2D (3,4)-connected topological layer interconnected by Cd2+ ions and HBDPO3- ligands, forming a 3D supramolecular structure through hydrogen bonding and pi center dot center dot center dot pi stacking interactions. Additionally, 1 exhibits luminescent properties and can be used as a sensor for detecting Fe3+ and Cr2O72-/CrO42- ions in natural water systems.
Reacting N,N '-bis(3,5-dicarboxyphenyl)oxalamide (H4BDPO) with d(10) electronic configuration Cd2+ ions under solvothermal conditions produces a two-dimensional (2D) metal-organic framework (MOF), {[Cd-3(HBDPO)(2)(H2O)(7)]center dot 4H(2)O}(n) (1), which has been further characterized by different methods, including X-ray single-crystal diffraction, elemental analysis, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). The structural analyses of 1 indicate that two crystallographically independent Cd2+ ions are interconnected by partly deprotonated HBDPO3- ligands to generate a 2D (3,4)-connected topological layer, and the adjacent layers are further formed in a 3D supramolecular structure by hydrogen bonding and pi center dot center dot center dot pi stacking interactions. Luminescent results show that 1 can serve as a luminescent sensor for sensitively detecting Fe3+ and Cr2O72-/CrO42- ions based on the fluorescence quenching effect. More importantly, the high stability of 1 makes it suitable for the detection of Fe3+ and Cr2O72-/CrO42- ions in the natural water system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据