4.1 Article

Real-World Assessment of an Ultrathin Strut, Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Submitted to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (INSTEMI Registry)

期刊

ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA
卷 120, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS CARDIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220594

关键词

Myocardial Infarction; Angioplasty; Drug-Eluting Stents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effectiveness of an ultrathin strut, sirolimus-eluting stent (Inspiron) with other third-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The results showed no significant differences in the rates of target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, mortality, and major cardiovascular outcomes between the two groups after a median follow-up of 17 months. Therefore, this study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of Inspiron in real-world clinical practice.
Background: The current gold standard of coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) consists of metal alloys with thinner struts and bioresorbable polymers.Objectives: Our aim was to compare an ultrathin strut, sirolimus-eluting stent (Inspiron (R)) with other third-generation DES platforms in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods: We analyzed data from a STEMI multicenter registry from reference centers in the South Region of Brazil. All patients were submitted to primary PCI, either with Inspiron (R) or other second-or third-generation DES. Propensity score matching (PSM) was computed to generate similar groups (Inspiron (R) versus other stents) in relation to clinical and procedural characteristics. All hypothesis tests had a two-sided significance level of 0.05.Results: From January 2017 to January 2021, 1711 patients underwent primary PCI, and 1417 patients met our entry criteria (709 patients in the Inspiron (R) group and 708 patients in the other second-or third-generation DES group). After PSM, the study sample was comprised of 706 patients (353 patients in the Inspiron (R) group and 353 patients in the other the other second-or third-generation DES group). The rates of target vessel revascularization (OR 0.52, CI 0.21 - 1.34, p = 0.173), stent thrombosis (OR 1.00, CI 0.29 - 3.48, p = 1.000), mortality (HR 0.724, CI 0.41 - 1.27, p = 0.257), and major cardiovascular outcomes (OR 1.170, CI 0.77 - 1.77, p = 0.526) were similar between groups after a median follow-up of 17 months.Conclusion: Our findings show that Inspiron (R) was effective and safe when compared to other second-or third-generation DES in a contemporary cohort of real-world STEMI patients submitted to primary PCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据