3.8 Article

Full cost of diagnostic pathology for lung carcinoma in Italy: results from four Pathology Units

期刊

PATHOLOGICA
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 83-89

出版社

PACINI EDITORE
DOI: 10.32074/1591-951X-837

关键词

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; diagnostic molecular pathology; molecular tests; cost; Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to calculate the full cost of diagnostic pathology tests for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in four Italian Pathology Units. Pathologists provided data on NSCLC samples and the necessary healthcare resources. The total cost per NSCLC tissue sample reached 659.77 euros, with the majority being direct costs. The findings can help negotiate new tariffs for NSCLC sample processing with third-party payers.
Objective. To calculate the full cost of diagnostic pathology tests for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) across four Italian Pathology Units. Methods. Pathology Units were located in private (2) and public (2) hospitals distributed across the Italian territory (North: 2; Centre: 1; South: 1). Pathologists provided via questionnaire data on tests on NSCLC samples along with the identi!cation and quanti!cation of the necessary healthcare resources (diagnostic technologies, laboratory instruments and personnel). Resources were valued according to hospital-speci!c unit, yearly and hourly costs (disposables; technologies; professional clusters). Results. The full cost per NSCLC tissue sample included histopathological immunophenotypic and required molecular analysis. Overall, it reached is an element of659.77 and it was mainly composed of direct costs (77.69%). The processing of a NSCLC tissue sample was labour intensive, as a relevant share of the full cost (44.98%) was actually due to personnel costs, with laboratory technicians, biologists and pathologist driving this !nding (17.09%,12.43% and 10.81%, respectively). Conclusions. The results of this research can facilitate the negotiation of new dedicated tariffs for NSCLC sample processing with the national or local third party-payers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据