4.8 Article

In situ oxidative polymerization of platinum(IV) prodrugs in pore-confined spaces of CaCO3 nanoparticles for cancer chemoimmunotherapy

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 25, 页码 7005-7015

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3sc02264a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug resistance and metastases are major causes of death in clinics. This study presents a novel strategy for the treatment of drug-resistant and metastatic tumors by using physical adsorption and oxidative polymerization of Pt(IV) prodrugs in pore-confined spaces of CaCO3 nanoparticles. The nanoparticles interact with cisplatin-resistant non-small lung cancer cells through multiple mechanisms, resulting in cell death by apoptosis, ferroptosis and immunogenic cell death.
Drug resistance and metastases are the leading causes of death in clinics. To overcome this limitation, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic agents and drug formulations that are able to therapeutically intervene by non-traditional mechanisms. Herein, the physical adsorption and oxidative polymerization of Pt(IV) prodrugs in pore-confined spaces of CaCO3 nanoparticles is presented, and the nanomaterial surface was coated with DSPE-PEG(2000)-Biotin to improve aqueous solubility and tumor targeting. While the nanoparticle scaffold remained stable in an aqueous solution, it quickly degraded into Ca2+ in the presence of acid and into cisplatin in the presence of GSH. The nanoparticles were found to interact in cisplatin-resistant non-small lung cancer cells by a multimodal mechanism of action involving mitochondrial Ca2+ overload, dual depletion of GSH, nuclear DNA platination, and amplification of ROS and lipid peroxide generation, resulting in triggering cell death by a combination of apoptosis, ferroptosis and immunogenic cell death in vitro and in vivo. This study could present a novel strategy for the treatment of drug-resistant and metastatic tumors and therefore overcome the limitations of currently used therapeutic agents in the clinics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据