4.1 Article

Assessment of Exercise Capacity of Individuals with Long COVID: A Cross-sectional Study

期刊

ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 83-87

出版社

ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOC JOURNAL

关键词

coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); physical capacity; phys-ical therapy; rehabilitation; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the functional capacity of individuals with long COVID and found that even mild cases resulted in decreased physical capacity. Severe cases and impaired diffusing capacity or myalgia during recovery were identified as risk factors.
Background: Clinical investigations of long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are rarely translated to objective findings.Objectives: To assess the functional capacity of individuals reported on deconditioning that hampered their return to their pre-COVID routine.Methods: Assessment included the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (30-STST). We compared the expected and observed scores using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Predictors of test scores were identified using linear regression models.Results: We included 49 individuals, of whom 38 (77.6%) were recovering from mild COVID-19. Twenty-seven (55.1%) individuals had a 6MWT score lower than 80% of expected. The average 6MWT scores were 129.5 +/- 121.2 meters and 12.2 +/- 5.0 repeats lower than expected scores, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). The 6MWT score was 107.3 meters lower for individuals with severe COVID-19 (P = 0.013) and rose by 2.7 meters per each 1% increase in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (P = 0.007). The 30-STST score was 3.0 repeats lower for individuals who reported moderate to severe myalgia (P = 0.038).Conclusions: Individuals with long COVID who report on deconditioning exhibit significantly decreased physical capacity, even following mild acute illness. Risk factors include severe COVID-19 and impaired diffusing capacity or myalgia during recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据