4.4 Article

Multi-institutional analysis of cervical esophageal carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: TROD 01-005 study

期刊

ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 299-306

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/or.2023.028840

关键词

Esophageal cancer; Chemoradiotherapy; Radiotherapy; Local control; Toxicity; Survival

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) patients who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Clinical data of 175 biopsy-confirmed CEC patients treated with definitive CRT were analyzed retrospectively. The study found that treatment response and patient performance status were significant prognostic factors for overall survival, progression-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival. In addition, higher radiation doses did not affect treatment outcomes. The study concluded that definitive CRT is a safe and effective treatment for CEC patients.
The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) patients who underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The clinical data of 175 biopsy -confirmed CEC patients treated with definitive CRT between April 2005 and September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed in uni-and multivariable analyses. The median age of the entire cohort was 56 years (range: 26-87 years). All patients received definitive radiotherapy with a median total dose of 60 Gy, and 52% of the patients received cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. The 2-year OS, PFS, and LRFS rates were 58.8%, 46.9%, and 52.4%, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 41.6 months. Patients' performance status, clinical nodal stage, tumor size, and treatment response were significant prognostic factors for OS, PFS, and LRFS in univariate analysis. Non-complete treatment response was an independent predictor for poor OS (HR = 4.41, 95% CI, 2.78-7.00, symbolscript < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 4.28, 95% CI, 2.79-6.58, symbolscript < 0.001), whereas poor performance score was a predictor for worse LRFS (HR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.12-2.98, symbolscript = 0.02) in multivariable analysis. Fifty-two patients (29.7%) experienced grade II or higher toxicity. In this multicenter study, we demonstrated that definitive CRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with CEC. Higher radiation doses were found to have no effect on treatment outcomes, but a better response to treatment and a better patient performance status did.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据