4.5 Article

Default egocentrism: an MVPA approach to overlap in own and others' socio-political attitudes

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsad028

关键词

attitudes; projection; theory of mind; MVPA; fMRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the neural mechanisms behind our ability to comprehend the socio-political attitudes of others is crucial, but understudied. This study used multivariate pattern analysis to examine the activation patterns in the default mode network (DMN) while participants assessed their own attitudes and those of others. The results showed that common patterns in DMN regions encode both self and other attitudes across a range of contemporary socio-political issues. These findings suggest a possible neural basis for egocentric biases in perceiving individual and group attitudes, as well as provide evidence for overlap between self and other mentalizing.
Understanding the socio-political attitudes of other people is a crucial skill, yet the neural mechanisms supporting this capacity remain understudied. This study used multivariate pattern analysis to examine patterns of activity in the default mode network (DMN) while participants assessed their own attitudes and the attitudes of other people. Classification analyses indicated that common patterns in DMN regions encode both own and others' support across a variety of contemporary socio-political issues. Moreover, cross-classification analyses demonstrated that a common coding of attitudes is implemented at a neural level. This shared informational content was associated with a greater perceived overlap between own attitude positions and those of others (i.e. attitudinal projection), such that higher cross-classification accuracy corresponded with greater attitudinal projection. This study thus identifies a possible neural basis for egocentric biases in the social perception of individual and group attitudes and provides additional evidence for self/other overlap in mentalizing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据