4.8 Article

Studies on the optical stability of CsPbBr3 with different dimensions (0D, 1D, 2D, 3D) under thermal environments

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 15, 期 26, 页码 11190-11198

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nr01863f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal stability of CsPbBr3 has been a bottleneck for its commercialization. This study systematically investigated the optical properties and thermal stability of CsPbBr3 with different dimensions and found that dimensional change directly influences its properties. 3D CsPbBr3 micron crystals showed relatively high thermal stability, which is promising for the commercialization of next-generation perovskite optoelectronic devices.
The thermal stability of phosphor materials had long been a bottleneck in their commercialization. Nowadays, cesium lead halide perovskite CsPbBr3 has been considered a potential replacement for the next generation of optoelectronic devices due to its excellent optical and electronic properties, however, the devices inevitably generate high temperatures on the surface under prolonged energization conditions in practical applications, which can be fatal to CsPbBr3. Despite the various strategies that have been employed to improve the thermal stability of CsPbBr3, systematic studies of the thermal stability of the basis CsPbBr3 are lacking. In this study, CsPbBr3 with different dimensions (0D quantum dots (QDs), 1D nanowires (NWs), 2D nanoplate (NPs), 3D micron crystals (MCs)) was prepared by traditional high-temperature thermal injection, and a systematic study was carried out on their optical properties and thermal stability. The results revealed that the dimensional change will directly influence the optical properties as well as the thermal stability of CsPbBr3. In particular, 3D CsPbBr3 MCs maintained relatively high thermal stability under high-temperature environments, which will bring interest for the commercialization of next-generation perovskite optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据