4.7 Article

WPConvNet: An Interpretable Wavelet Packet Kernel-Constrained Convolutional Network for Noise-Robust Fault Diagnosis

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3282599

关键词

Deep learning (DL); fault diagnosis; interpretability; noise robustness; wavelet packet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proposed an interpretable wavelet packet kernel-constrained convolutional network (WPConvNet) for noise-robust fault diagnosis, which combines the feature extraction ability of wavelet bases and the learning ability of convolutional kernels. The proposed architecture outperforms other diagnosis models in terms of interpretability and noise robustness.
Deep learning (DL) has present great diagnostic results in fault diagnosis field. However, the poor interpretability and noise robustness of DL-based methods are still the main factors limiting their wide application in industry. To address these issues, an interpretable wavelet packet kernel-constrained convolutional network (WPConvNet) is proposed for noise-robust fault diagnosis, which combines the feature extraction ability of wavelet bases and the learning ability of convolutional kernels together. First, the wavelet packet convolutional (WPConv) layer is proposed, and constraints are imposed to convolutional kernels, so that each convolution layer is a learnable discrete wavelet transform. Second, a soft threshold activation is proposed to reduce the noise component in feature maps, whose threshold is adaptively learned by estimating the standard deviation of noise. Third, we link the cascaded convolutional structure of convolutional neutral network (CNN) with wavelet packet decomposition and reconstruction using Mallat algorithm, which is interpretable in model architecture. Extensive experiments are carried out on two bearing fault datasets, and the results show that the proposed architecture outperforms other diagnosis models in terms of interpretability and noise robustness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据