4.6 Article

Oxygen deficient yolk-shell structured Co3O4 microspheres as an oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst for anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 11, 期 31, 页码 16578-16585

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta02710d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an oxygen deficient yolk-shell structured Co3O4 was developed as the oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst for anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs). The yolk-shell structure provided a large surface area, and the introduction of oxygen vacancies enhanced the OER activity. The abundant voids facilitated mass transport and reduced mass transport loss, resulting in excellent performance at high current density. This work suggests that yolk-shell structured electrocatalysts can effectively improve the performance of AEMWEs and overcome the current obstacle to commercialization.
Anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) are a promising next-generation technology for producing clean hydrogen using cost-effective, non-platinum group metal (non-PGM) based electrocatalysts. Despite their potential advantages, their low energy conversion efficiency presents a significant obstacle to their commercialization. Herein, we developed an oxygen deficient yolk-shell structured Co3O4 as the oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalyst for AEMWEs. The yolk-shell structure provided a large surface area, and the introduction of oxygen vacancies to the yolk-shell structured Co3O4 modulated the electronic structure and enhanced the OER activity. The abundant voids in the yolk-shell structure facilitated mass transport and effectively reduced mass transport loss in the AEMWE, resulting in excellent performance at high current density. This work suggests that the yolk-shell structured electrocatalysts can effectively improve the performance of AEMWEs, thereby addressing the major obstacle that is currently delaying their commercialization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据