4.7 Article

Improved Hydrolysis of Granular Starches by a Psychrophilic α-Amylase Starch Binding Domain-Fusion

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 71, 期 23, 页码 9040-9050

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c01898

关键词

carbohydrate-binding module; waxy starch; normalstarch; high-amylose starch; Pseudoalteromonashaloplanktis alpha-amylase; heterogenous catalysis; Sabatier principle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degradation of starch granules can be increased by fusing the psychrophilic a-amylase AHA from Antarctic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAB23 with starch-binding domains (SBD) from either Aspergillus niger glucoamylase (SBDGA) or Arabidopsis thaliana glucan, water dikinase 3 (SBDGWD3). The fusion enzymes showed higher activity than the wild-type AHA, depending on the starch type and source. The increased density of enzyme attack-sites and binding-sites on the starch granules was measured using an interfacial catalysis approach.
Degradation of starch granules by a psychrophilic a-amylase, AHA, from the Antarctic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAB23 was facilitated by C-terminal fusion to a starch-binding domain (SBD) from either Aspergillus niger glucoamylase (SBDGA) or Arabidopsis thaliana glucan, water dikinase 3 (SBDGWD3) via a decapeptide linker. Depending on the waxy, normal or high-amylose starch type and the botanical source, the AHA-SBD fusion enzymes showed up to 3 times higher activity than AHA wild-type. The SBD-fusion thus increased the density of enzyme attack-sites and binding-sites on the starch granules by up to 5- and 7-fold, respectively, as measured using an interfacial catalysis approach that combined conventional Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with the substrate in excess, and inverse kinetics, having enzyme in excess, with enzyme-starch granule adsorption isotherms. Higher substrate affinity of the SBDGA compared to SBDGWD3 was accompanied by the superior activity of AHA-SBDGA in agreement with the Sabatier principle of adsorption limited heterogenous catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据