4.4 Article

Assent in Pediatric Critical Care Research: A Cross-Sectional Stakeholder Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards, Research Coordinators, Pediatric Critical Care Researchers, and Nurses*

期刊

PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 E179-E189

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003135

关键词

assent; consent; ethics; pediatric critical care; research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study surveyed four stakeholder groups involved in research in Canadian PICUs to understand their perspectives and barriers to obtaining assent. It was found that a significant percentage of participants believed that obtaining assent during the first 48 hours of PICU admission was difficult and that there were unique barriers to assent at the time of enrollment. There was a lack of consensus on the operationalization of the assent process, but most stakeholders agreed that children should have the opportunity to decide if their samples could stay in a biobank once they are old enough to do so.
OBJECTIVES:Survey of four stakeholder groups involved in defining and obtaining assent for research in Canadian PICUs to better understand their perspectives and perceived barriers to assent. DESIGN:Cross-sectional survey. SETTING:Fourteen tertiary-care pediatric hospitals in Canada. PARTICIPANTS:Research Ethics Board Chairs, pediatric critical care nurses, research coordinators, and researchers. INTERVENTIONS:None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:A total of 193 participants responded. Thirty-seven percent (59/159) thought it was Never/Almost Never (59/159, 37%) feasible to obtain assent during the first 48 hours of PICU admission, and 112 of 170 (66%) indicated there are unique barriers to assent at the time of enrollment in PICU studies. Asking children for assent was most frequently rated as Important/Very Important for interviews/focus groups with the child (138/180, 77%), blood sample collection with a needle poke for research (137/178, 77%), and studies involving genetic testing with results communicated to the child/legal guardian (134/180, 74%). In two scenarios where a child and legal guardian disagreed about study participation, most respondents indicated that whether the child should still be enrolled would depend on the patient's age (34-36%), and/or the risk of the study (24-28%). There was a lack of consensus over how the assent process should be operationalized, and when and for how long children should be followed to seek assent for ongoing study participation. Most stakeholders (117/158, 74%) thought that children should have the opportunity to decide if their samples could stay in a biobank once they are old enough to do so. CONCLUSIONS:There was an overall lack of consensus on the feasibility of, and challenges associated with, obtaining assent at the time of study enrollment and on how key aspects of the assent process should be operationalized in the PICU. This highlights the need for guidelines to clarify the assent process in pediatric critical care research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据