4.7 Article

Second harmonic generation from symmetry breaking stimulated by mixed organic cations in zero-dimensional hybrid metal halides

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 52, 期 27, 页码 9368-9376

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3dt01209c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixing cations with different chemical properties is a new approach for tuning the optical properties of hybrid organic-inorganic metal halides (HOIMHs). In this study, zero-dimensional (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)MBr6 (M = Bi/Sb) with two different cations were synthesized, resulting in significant second harmonic generation. The synthesized compounds exhibited direct bandgaps and bright yellow emission due to fluorescence emission.
Mixing cations with different chemical properties to induce the generation of asymmetric structures is a new approach for tuning the optical properties of hybrid organic-inorganic metal halides (HOIMHs). In this study, zero-dimensional (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)MBr6 (M = Bi/Sb, [C9N3H15](2+) = [(C4N2H10)(C5NH5)](2+) and [C9H14SO](+) = [CH3(C6H4)OS(CH3)(2)](+)) are synthesized. Two different cations cause both compounds to crystallize in the polar space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), thus resulting in significant phase matchable second harmonic generation under a 1064 nm laser excitation. Thus, (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)BiBr6 and (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)SbBr6 exhibit intensities that are approximately 1.8 and 1.7 times that of KH2PO4, respectively. The results of density functional theory calculations show that both (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)BiBr6 and (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)SbBr6 exhibit direct bandgaps of 2.95 and 2.81 eV, respectively. Additionally, because of the distortion of the inorganic octahedra, (C9N3H15)(C9H13SO)SbBr6 exhibited bright yellow emission at room temperature, which is attributed to ns(2) fluorescence emission. We believe that the symmetry of the HOIMH crystal structure can be broken by introducing spatially differentiated bifunctional organic cations, which consequently enables even-order nonlinear activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据