4.6 Article

A lightweight delegated private set intersection cardinality protocol

期刊

COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2023.103760

关键词

Privacy computing; PSI cardinality; Oblivious PRF; Delegated computing; Contact tracing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a lightweight delegated PSI-CA protocol based on multi-point oblivious pseudorandom function and collision-resistant hash function, and utilizes it to build a privacy-preserving contact tracing system. Experimental results show that our system is more practical and advantageous for densely populated areas.
Secure multiparty computation (MPC) is an important means to realize privacy computing (PC). Private set intersection cardinality (PSI-CA) is a variant of an important problem in MPC research, that is private set intersection. PSI-CA allows multiple participants jointly compute the size of the common intersection of their private sets through interaction without revealing any other information about their respective sets. Delegated PSI-CA delegates a large number of computing in the protocol to some untrusted cloud servers, which makes the protocol efficient. Delegated PSI-CA is considered to be of great significance for the construction of privacy -preserving contact tracing systems recently. However, the existing work is still not ideal for the resource-limited mobile terminal of clients. In this paper, we propose a lightweight delegated PSI-CA protocol based on multi -point oblivious pseudorandom function and collision-resistant hash function. Our protocol does not need to do additional pre-operations, so the computation complexity and the communication complexity on the client side are further reduced compare to the existing works. In addition, we build a privacy-preserving contact tracing system by utilizing our protocol, which can be publicly checked if necessary, named PC-CONTrace. The experimental results show that our system is more practical and advantageous for densely populated areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据