4.7 Article

Diversity of glucosinolates among common Brassicaceae vegetables in China

期刊

HORTICULTURAL PLANT JOURNAL
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 365-380

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2022.08.006

关键词

Brassicaceae; Glucosinolates; Isothiocyanates; Diversity; Human health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brassicaceae vegetables are essential in both China and the rest of the world, providing nutrients and phytochemicals that promote human health. This review focuses on the diversity of commonly consumed Brassicaceae vegetables and the glucosinolate (GSL) composition in the edible parts. Factors influencing GSL content, as well as the roles and functions of GSL, are also discussed. The information presented in this review guides consumers in selecting vegetables with high GSL content, optimal stages for consumption, and suitable cooking methods. Additionally, this review provides a theoretical foundation for crop molecular breeding and the market development of GSL products.
Brassicaceae vegetables are an important traditional daily food in China and around the world, which provide nutrients and phytochemicals that are beneficial for human health. Among them, Brassica and Raphanus are widely cultivated and eaten, have been evolved and/or bred for special characteristics during the long history of cultivation. Epidemiological studies suggest that the health benefits of Brassicaceae vegetables are mainly associated with glucosinolates (GSLs) and their hydrolytic products. In this review, we discuss the diversity of common consumed Brassicaceae vegetables and their GSL composition in edible parts. We also discuss the diversity factors affecting GSL content, and the diversity roles and functions of GSL. The information in this review provides guidance for consumers to select vegetables with a high GSL content, optimum edible stages, suitable edible methods, and provides a theoretical basis for crop molecular breeding and market development of GSL products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据