4.6 Article

Dynamics of diverse polarization singularities in momentum space with far-field interference

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.013504

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the combination of a photonic crystal slab and a reflected multilayer substrate is used to dynamically manipulate the polarization singularities. By adjusting the spacing between the slab and the substrate, circularly polarized states and bound states in the continuum are generated and collide with intrinsic bound states. Importantly, all these bound states are topologically protected throughout the dynamic process due to the preservation of structural symmetry.
Polarization singularities in momentum space, including bound states in the continuum (BICs) and circularly polarized states (CPSs), render great potential in singular and chiral optics. As far-field topological signatures of Bloch modes in photonic crystal slab, the dynamic evolution of the polarization singularities is observed by tuning the geometric parameters of the slab itself. Here, we combine the photonic crystal slab with a reflected multilayer substrate in which interference between the reflected optical field and the upward radiation of the Bloch mode brings us an extra degree of freedom to manipulate the polarization singularities without breaking the structural symmetry. As the polarization singularities evolve with the spacing between the photonic crystal slab and the substrate, the CPSs and extrinsic BICs are both generated from charge reversal of the at -P intrinsic BIC and then collide with the off -P intrinsic BICs. Importantly, all BICs are topologically protected from splitting throughout the whole dynamic process owing to the preservation of structural symmetry. Our findings suggest an alternative route to pursue ultrahigh -Q CPS resonances and merge diverse BICs, which is potentially applicable in chiral optics, topological photonics, and beam modulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据