Calibration of Low-cost Sensors for Measurement of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentrations via Laboratory/Field Evaluation

Recently, low-cost sensors (LCSs) have been widely used in monitoring particulate matter (PM) mass concentrations. Maintaining the accuracy of the sensors is important and requires rigorous calibration and performance evaluation. In this study, two commercial LCSs, Plantower PMS3003 and Plantower PMS7003, were evaluated in the laboratory and in the field using a reference-grade PM monitor (GRIMM 11-D). Laboratory evaluation was conducted with polystyrene latex (PSL) particles in a 1 m3 chamber at 20 & DEG;C with a relative humidity of 20%. Each LCS indicated higher mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D for small-sized PSL particles (0.56 & mu;m); however, the LCSs indicated lower mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D for PSL particles larger than 0.56 & mu;m. In addition, the difference in mass concentrations between the LCS and GRIMM 11-D became higher with particle sizes greater than 0.56 & mu;m. Nonetheless, a high correlation (R2 > 0.9) between each LCS and GRIMM 11-D was obtained.Field evaluation was conducted at Yonsei University (Seoul, South Korea) from February 12 to March 31, 2022. The LCSs showed generally higher PM mass concentrations than GRIMM 11-D; however, some data points of the LCSs revealed different trends. We observed that outdoor PM10/PM2.5 and relative humidity had notable impacts on the LCS data; in addition, LCS sensitivity depended on whether the PM concentration was low or high. Based on these observations, regression-based calibration models were constructed using the selected independent variables (outdoor PM10/PM2.5 and relative humidity) after dividing the PM concentration into low and high sections. Consequently, the accuracy of the LCSs was significantly enhanced. Therefore, using LCSs with the calibration models can replace the use of expensive reference PM monitors, resulting in cost savings.

Automated summary

Recently, low-cost sensors (LCSs) have been extensively used for monitoring particulate matter (PM) mass concentrations. This study evaluated two commercial LCSs, Plantower PMS3003 and Plantower PMS7003, in the laboratory and field using a reference-grade PM monitor (GRIMM 11-D). The LCSs showed differences in mass concentrations compared to the reference monitor, but a high correlation was observed. Field evaluation showed that the LCSs generally had higher PM mass concentrations, but the sensitivity varied with outdoor PM10/PM2.5 levels and relative humidity. Calibration models improved the accuracy of the LCSs, making them a cost-saving alternative to expensive reference monitors.