4.3 Article

Diagnosis of chylous abdominal effusions: what is the triglyceride threshold value?

期刊

BIOCHEMIA MEDICA
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CROATIAN SOC MEDICAL BIOCHEMISTRY & LABORATORY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.11613/BM.2023.020902BiochemMed

关键词

chylous ascites; lipoprotein gel electrophoresis; triglycerides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chylous abdominal effusions are serious complications that can be triggered by various causes. The detection of chylomicrons in ascites or in peritoneal fluid capsules is the biochemical diagnosis of chyle leakage. Assaying the concentration of triglycerides in the fluid is the first-line tool. This study aimed to provide practical triglyceride thresholds for diagnosing chylous ascites in humans.
Introduction: Chylous abdominal effusions are serious complications that can be triggered by various aetiologies. The biochemical diagnosis of chyle leakage in ascites or in peritoneal fluid capsules relies on the detection of chylomicrons. Assaying the fluid's concentration of triglycerides is still the first-line tool. Given that only one comparative study has sought to quantify the value of the triglyceride assay for diagnosing chylous ascites in humans, our objective was to provide practical triglyceride thresholds. Materials and methods: We conducted a 9-year, retrospective, single-centre study of adult patients and compared a triglyceride assay with lipoprotein gel electrophoresis for the analysis of 90 non-recurring abdominal effusions (ascites and abdominal collections) of which 65 were chylous.Results: A triglyceride threshold of 0.4 mmol/L was associated with a sensitivity > 95%, and a threshold of 2.4 mmol/L was associated with a specificity > 95%. According to Youden index, the best threshold was 0.65 mmol/L with a sensitivity of 88 (77-95)%, a specificity of 72 (51-88)%, and, in our series, a positive predictive value of 89 (79-95)% and a negative predictive value of 69 (48-86)%.Conclusions: In our series, cut-off of 0.4 mmol/L could be used for ruling-out diagnosis of chylous effusions, while cut-off of 2.4 mmol/L could be used for reasonably confirming diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据