3.8 Proceedings Paper

Reliability issues of gate oxides and p-n junctions for vertical GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (Invited)

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/IRPS48203.2023.10118047

关键词

MOSFET power amplifiers; Dielectric breakdown; Semiconductor defects; Stress measurement; Semiconductor device reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the reliability issues of gate oxides and p-n junctions in vertical GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs). A specially designed AlSiO gate oxide on GaN showed excellent stability and a projected lifetime of over 20 years at high temperatures. The reliability of GaN p-n diodes (PNDs) with different threading dislocation densities was also evaluated. The fabricated PNDs demonstrated robustness under high-temperature reverse bias, but reverse leakage pathways were formed at threading screw dislocations after continuous forward current stress, which should be minimized in future GaN substrates.
We focus on reliability issues of gate oxides and p-n junctions to realize vertical GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs). An annealed AlSiO gate oxide on GaN displayed a lifetime of over 20 years at 150 degrees C and suppressed positive bias instability in MOSFETs. The key to high channel mobility and stability under positive gate bias is the interface structure designed to minimize oxide border traps. We also evaluated the reliability of GaN p-n diodes (PNDs) on freestanding GaN substrates with different threading dislocation densities. The reverse leakage for PNDs involving threading dislocations was explained by variable-range hopping, while the reverse leakage for dislocation-free PNDs was dominated by band-to-band tunneling. The fabricated PNDs demonstrated excellent robustness under high-temperature reverse bias. However, after continuous forward current stress, reverse leakage pathways were formed at threading screw dislocations, which should be minimized in future GaN substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据