4.6 Article

Universal Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling in noisy hybrid quantum circuits

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 107, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L201113

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Letter investigates the effect of quantum noise on measurement-induced phase transitions (MIPT), and reveals that quantum noise can lead to the emergence of the area law entanglement and a novel q-1/3 power-law scaling behavior under certain measurement rates. By analyzing the relationship between the quantum model and a classical statistical model, it is shown that the area law entanglement is the consequence of noise-driven symmetry-breaking field, and the q-1/3 scaling can be understood as the result of Kardar-Parisi-Zhang fluctuations.
Measurement-induced phase transitions (MIPTs) have attracted increasing attention due to the rich phe-nomenology of entanglement structures and their relation with quantum information processing. Since physical systems are unavoidably coupled to environment, quantum noise, which can qualitatively modify or even destroy certain entanglement structure, needs to be considered in analyzing a system with MIPT. In this Letter, we investigate the effect of quantum noise modeled by a reset quantum channel acting on each site with a probability q on MIPT. Based on the numerical results from Clifford circuits, we show that the quantum noise can qualitatively change the entanglement properties-the entanglement obeys area law instead of volume law with a measurement rate p < pc. In the noise-induced area law phase, the entanglement exhibits a novel q-1/3 power-law scaling. Using an analytic mapping from the quantum model to a classical statistical model, we further show that the area law entanglement is the consequence of noise-driven symmetry-breaking field, and the q-1/3 scaling can be understood as the result of Kardar-Parisi-Zhang fluctuations of directed polymer with an effective length scale Leff ti q-1 in a random environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据