4.5 Article

Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol compared with albuterol in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0223-3

关键词

Randomized controlled trial; Moderate-to-severe asthma; Ipratropium bromide; Albuterol hydrofluoroalkaline; Ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler; Anticholinergic/beta(2)-agonist; Bronchodilation; As-needed; Acute symptom relief

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Many patients with asthma require frequent rescue medication for acute symptoms despite appropriate controller therapies. Thus, determining the most effective relief regimen is important in the management of more severe asthma. This study's objective was to evaluate whether ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (CVT-MDI) provides more effective acute relief of bronchospasm in moderate-to-severe asthma than albuterol hydrofluoroalkaline (ALB-HFA) alone after 4 weeks. Methods: In this double-blind, crossover study, patients who had been diagnosed with asthma for >= 1 year were randomized to two sequences of study medication as needed for symptom relief (1-7 day washout before second 4-week treatment period): CVT-MDI/ALB-HFA or ALB-HFA/CVT-MDI. On days 1 and 29 of each sequence, 6-hour serial spirometry was performed after administration of the study drug. Co-primary endpoints were FEV1 area under the curve (AUC(0-6)) and peak (post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) response (change from test day baseline) after 4 weeks. The effects of as needed treatment with ALB-HFA/CVT-MDI were analyzed using mixed effect model repeated measures (MMRM). Results: A total of 226 patients, >= 18 years old, with inadequately controlled, moderate-to-severe asthma were randomized. The study met both co-primary endpoints demonstrating a statistically significant treatment benefit of CVT-MDI versus ALB-HFA. FEV1 AUC(0-6h) response was 167 ml for ALB-HFA, 252 ml for CVT-MDI (p < 0.0001); peak FEV1 response was 357 ml for ALB-HFA, 434 ml for CVT-MDI (p < 0.0001). Adverse events were comparable across groups. Conclusions: CVT-MDI significantly improved acute bronchodilation over ALB-HFA alone after 4 weeks of as-needed use for symptom relief, with a similar safety profile. This suggests additive bronchodilator effects of beta(2)-agonist and anticholinergic treatment in moderate-to-severe, symptomatic asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据