4.7 Article

Minimal Nambu-Goldstone-Higgs model in supersymmetric SU(5) revisited

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.035016

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We revisit the minimal Nambu-Goldstone-Higgs supersymmetric (SUSY) SU(5) grand unified model and study its phenomenological implications. The Higgs sector possesses a global SU(6) symmetry and leads to light Higgs doublets, solving the doublet-triplet splitting problem. The model is more predictive than the minimal SUSY SU(5) due to the tightly restricted couplings of the Higgs sector. The perturbativity condition on the trilinear coupling of the adjoint Higgs field imposes limits on the wino and gluino masses.
We revisit the minimal Nambu-Goldstone(NG)-Higgs supersymmetric (SUSY) SU(5) grand unified model and study its phenomenological implications. The Higgs sector of the model possesses a global SU (6) symmetry, which is spontaneously broken and results in the Higgs doublets of the minimal SUSY Standard Model (MSSM) as NG chiral superfields. Therefore, the model naturally leads to light Higgs doublets and solves the doublet-triplet splitting problem. Because of the SU(6) symmetry, the couplings of the Higgs sector are tightly restricted, and thus the model is more predictive than the minimal SUSY SU(5). We determine all the grand unified theory parameters via the matching conditions of the gauge coupling constants at the unification scale and calculate proton lifetime, confronting this with current experimental bounds. We discuss that this model is incompatible with the constrained MSSM, whilst it has a large viable parameter space in the high-scale SUSY scenario. The perturbativity condition on the trilinear coupling of the adjoint Higgs field imposes an upper (lower) limit on the wino (gluino) mass, implying a hierarchical mass pattern for these gauginos. Future proton-decay searches can probe a large part of the parameter space, especially if the SUSY-breaking scale is less than or similar to 100 TeV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据