4.6 Article

Conflicting cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and progression to dementia due to Alzheimer's disease

期刊

ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13195-016-0220-z

关键词

Prognosis; Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Cerebrospinal fluid

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01 AG024904]
  2. DOD ADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  5. Alzheimer's Association
  6. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  7. Araclon Biotech
  8. BioClinica, Inc.
  9. Biogen Idec Inc.
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  11. Eisai Inc.
  12. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  13. Eli Lilly and Company
  14. EuroImmun
  15. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.
  16. Fujirebio
  17. GE Healthcare
  18. IXICO Ltd
  19. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC
  20. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC
  21. Medpace, Inc.
  22. Merck Co., Inc.
  23. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC
  24. NeuroRx Research
  25. Neurotrack Technologies
  26. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  27. Pfizer Inc.
  28. Piramal Imaging
  29. Servier
  30. Synarc Inc.
  31. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  32. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: According to new diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease (AD), biomarkers enable estimation of the individual likelihood of underlying AD pathophysiology and the associated risk of progression to AD dementia for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Nonetheless, how conflicting biomarker constellations affect the progression risk is still elusive. The present study explored the impact of different cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker constellations on the progression risk of MCI patients. Methods: A multicentre cohort of 469 patients with MCI and available CSF biomarker results and clinical follow-up data was considered. Biomarker values were categorized as positive for AD, negative or borderline. Progression risk differences between patients with different constellations of total Tau (t-Tau), phosphorylated Tau at threonine 181 (p-Tau) and amyloid-beta 1-42 (A beta(42)) were studied. Group comparison analyses and Cox regression models were employed. Results: Patients with all biomarkers positive for AD (N = 145) had the highest hazard for progression to dementia due to AD, whilst patients with no positive biomarkers (N = 111) had the lowest. The risk of patients with only abnormal p-Tau and/or t-Tau (N = 49) or with positive A beta(42) in combination with positive t-Tau or p-Tau (N = 119) is significantly lower than that of patients with all biomarkers positive. Conclusions: The risk of progression to dementia due to AD differs between patients with different CSF biomarker constellations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据