4.2 Article

Expression of dual-specifiicity phosphatases in TGFss1-induced EMT in SKOV3 cells

期刊

TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 640-646

出版社

Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey
DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5626

关键词

Dual-specificity phosphatases; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; TGF(31; ovarian carcinoma; SKOV3; MAPK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to profile the expression of dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSPs) in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) induced by Transforming growth factor (TGF)β1. TGF(31) treatment decreased E-cadherin expression and increased expression of EMT markers Snail and Slug. The activation of MAPKs was enhanced and the expression of certain DUSPs was altered in response to TGF(31).
Background/aim: The study aims to profile the dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSP) expression in response to Transforming growth factor (31 (TGF(31)-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells.Materials and methods: The ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line SKOV3 was used as a TGF(31-induced EMT model. Cells were incubated with 5 ng/mL TGF(31 to induce EMT. EMT was confirmed with real-time qPCR, western blot, and immunofluorescence analyses of various EMT markers. Western blot was used to analyze phospho-and total MAPK protein levels. Typical and atypical DUSPs mRNA expression profile was determined by real-time qPCR.Results: The epithelial marker E-cadherin expressions were decreased and mesenchymal EMT markers Snail and Slug expression levels were increased after TGF(31 induction. Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK were enhanced in response to TGF(31 treatment. The expression of DUSP2, DUSP6, DUSP8, DUSP10, and DUSP13 were decreased while DUSP7, DUSP16, DUSP18, DUSP21, and DUSP27 were increased by TGF(31.Conclusion: TGF(31 induced EMT which was accompanied by increased activity of MAPKs, and led to marked changes in expressions of several DUSPs in SKOV3 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据