4.4 Review

Heterogeneous Catalysts for Selective Hydrogenolysis of Biomass-derived Polyols

期刊

ACTA CHIMICA SINICA
卷 81, 期 5, 页码 533-547

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.6023/A23020042

关键词

biomass-derived polyols; sugar alcohols; heterogeneous catalyst; bifunctional catalyst; hydrodeoxygenation; selective hydrogenolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic transformation of biomass-derived polyols into valuable chemicals using renewable carbon resources is an important research area. In this review, the selective conversion of sugar alcohols into mono-alcohols and/or diols is discussed, with a focus on the design and preparation of heterogeneous catalysts with high activity, selectivity, and stability. The metal-metal oxide interaction, catalyst structure-performance relationship, and reaction mechanism for C-O hydrogenolysis are highlighted. The future trends for selective hydrogenolysis of sugars are also discussed.
Catalytic transformation of biomass-derived polyols into valuable chemicals has attracted attention from the viewpoint on using renewable carbon resources. Therefore, it is important for design and preparation of heterogeneous catalysts with high activity, high selectivity, and high stability for the selective conversion of biomass-derived polyols. Recently, it has been reported the selective production of mono-alcohols and/or diols by selective hydrogenolysis of sugar alcohols, where the Ir-ReOx and Pt-WOx as typical heterogeneous catalysts are highly efficient. In this review, we briefly summarized the routes for the selective conversion of sugar alcohols into mono-alcohols and/or diols, where the metal-metal oxide interaction for catalyst design, relationship between catalyst structure and performance, and reaction mechanism for the C-O hydrogenolysis are particularly discussed. In addition, the future trend for the selective hydrogenolysis of sugars is also prospected. This review might be helpful for design of novel heterogeneous catalysts in sugar alcohol conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据