4.7 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic H2 production performance of Au@Cu2O-Ta3N5 discrete ternary core-shell spheres

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 635, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157682

关键词

Discrete ternary core-shell structure; Au@Cu2O-Ta3N5; Photocatalytic H-2 production; Enhanced photocatalytic mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, novel Au@Cu2O-Ta3N5 discrete core-shell ternary nanospheres were prepared for highly efficient photocatalytic H-2 production. The core-shell structure irradiated for 2 h showed a higher photocatalytic H-2 production rate compared to other samples. The enhanced performance is attributed to the unique discrete core-shell structure, designed appropriate band structure, low charge transfer resistance, and high electron-hole separation ability. This study provides a novel Ta3N5-based ternary core-shell structure for high-performance H-2 production.
Ta3N5 owns a theoretical band structure for photocatalytic H-2 production. However, the practical production performance is unsatisfactory, which is probably attributed to fast electron-hole recombination. In this study, we design novel Au@Cu2O-Ta3N5 discrete core-shell ternary nanospheres for highly efficient photocatalytic H-2 production by splitting water. This catalyst is prepared by coating Cu2O on the Au nanoparticles of Au-Ta3N5 nanospheres via an illumination method. The core-shell structure irradiated for 2 h (Au@Cu2O-Ta3N5 2 h) shows higher photocatalytic H-2 production rate (65.78 mu mol.g(-1).h(-1)) than Au-Ta3N5 (0.5% Au-Ta3N5, 22.43 mu mol.g(-1).h(-1)), Au-Cu2O-Ta3N5 (32.24 mu mol.g(-1).h(-1)), and fully covered Au@Cu2O-Ta3N5 5 h sample (51.27 mu mol.g(-1).h(-1)). The enhanced performance is attributed to the unique discrete core-shell structure, designed appropriate band structure, low charge transfer resistance, and high electron-hole separation ability. This study provides a novel Ta3N5-based ternary core-shell structure for high-performance H-2 production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据