4.8 Review

Metal biosorption onto non-living algae: a critical review on metal recovery from wastewater

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 15, 页码 5775-5788

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3gc01993d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread presence of metals in water bodies has driven the development of platforms for their removal and recovery. Biosorption, specifically using algae, has emerged as a sustainable and cost-effective method for metal removal from wastewater. However, there are still gaps in the research, such as limited studies in natural wastewater and a lack of consideration for ion and metal competition. This study explores the application of non-living algae for metal recovery and compares their sorption capacity with other wastewater matrices, as well as evaluating the cost performance compared to commercial and waste-based sorbents.
The widespread occurrence of metals in water bodies has been fueling the development of platforms for removing and recovering these elements. Biosorption has emerged as a potential tool for metal removal from wastewater. Among the available biosorbents, algae have been highlighted as a sustainable and cost-effective sorbent. Despite the blooming interest in this field, most studies comprise transversal gaps that prevent it from progressing. Herein, the application of non-living algae for metal recovery from wastewater is discussed. Limitations such as rudimentary cultivation, water decontamination emphasis in detriment to metal recovery and lack of reports contemplating ion and metal competition are addressed. Due to the limited number of studies conducted in natural wastewater, a practical application of non-living Sargassum sp. into acid mine drainage is shown. The obtained sorption capacity values are compared with those from other wastewater to evaluate the potential of non-living algae for metal sorption in real matrices. A critical review on the cost performance of algae as opposed to commercial and waste-based sorbents is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据