4.7 Article

Effects of Graphene Quantum Dots on the Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 702-710

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201500770

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2014QY003, 2014JC019]
  2. Innovation Research Group [IRG: 51321091]
  3. 100 Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. thousands talents program for pioneer researcher and his innovation team, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The infl uence of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) on key characteristics of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) phenotype (i.e., self-renewal, differentiation potential, and pluripotency) is systematically investigated in this work. First, the viability and impact of GQDs on the self-renewal potential of MSCs is evaluated in order to determine a threshold for the exposing dose. Second, GQDs uptake by MSCs is confirmed due to the excellent fluorescent properties of the particles. They exhibit a homogenous cytoplasmatic distribution that increases with the time and concentration. Third, the impact of GQDs on the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs is deeply characterized. An enhanced activity of alkaline phosphatase promoted by GQDs indicates early activation of osteogenesis. This is also confirmed upon GQD-induced up-regulation of phenotypically related osteogenic genes (Runx2, osteopontin, and osteocalcin) and specific biomarkers expression (osteopontin and osteocalcin). GQDs also effectively enhance the formation of calcium-rich deposits characteristics of osteoblasts. Furthermore, genes microarray results indicate that the enhanced osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by GQDs is in progress through a bone morphogenetic protein and transforming growth factor-beta relative signaling pathways. Finally, intracytoplasmatic lipid detection shows that GQDs can also promote the adipogenic differentiation of MSCs, thus confi rming the prevalence of their pluripotency potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据