4.6 Article

Distinguishing different surface interactions for nucleotides adsorbed onto hematite and goethite particle surfaces through ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and DFT calculations

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 30, 页码 20557-20566

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp01200j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the surface chemistry of nucleotides adsorbed on two different minerals, hematite and goethite, using infrared spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The results show preferential adsorption of the phosphate group to either surface. The experimental absorption frequencies were compared to DFT calculations, revealing differences in the binding modes of nucleotides to the two mineral surfaces.
Geochemical interfaces can impact the fate and transport of aqueous species in the environment including biomolecules. In this study, we investigate the surface chemistry of adsorbed nucleotides on two different minerals, hematite and goethite, using infrared spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is used to probe the adsorption of deoxyadenosine monophosphate (dAMP), deoxyguanosine monophosphate (dGMP), deoxycytidine monophosphate (dCMP), and deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP) onto either hematite or goethite particle surfaces. The results show preferential adsorption of the phosphate group to either surface. Remarkably, surface adsorption of the four nucleotides onto either hematite or goethite have nearly identical experimental spectra in the phosphate region (900 to 1200 cm(-1)) for each mineral surface yet are distinctly different between the two minerals, suggesting differences in binding of these nucleotides to the two mineral surfaces. The experimental absorption frequencies in the phosphate region were compared to DFT calculations for nucleotides adsorbed through the phosphate group to binuclear clusters in either a monodentate or bidentate bridging coordination. Although the quality of the fits suggests that both binding modes may be present, the relative amounts differ on the two surfaces with preferential bonding suggested to be monodentate coordination on hematite and bidentate bridging on goethite. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据