4.6 Article

A Hybrid Discrete Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Imaging Satellite Mission Planning

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 40006-40017

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3269066

关键词

Satellites; Planning; Heuristic algorithms; Optimization; Imaging; Artificial bee colony algorithm; Search problems; imaging satellite; mission planning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a hybrid discrete artificial bee colony (HDABC) algorithm is proposed to address the core problem of imaging satellite mission planning. The algorithm improves upon the basic artificial bee colony algorithm and shows good performance in simulation experiments.
Imaging satellite mission planning has received more and more attention as one of the core problems in the field of imaging satellite applications. In this paper, a hybrid discrete artificial bee colony (HDABC) algorithm is proposed to address this problem. The HDABC algorithm improves the three search phases of the basic artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm to make them applicable to the discrete satellite mission planning problem. In the employed bee search phase, the population is divided and a multi-strategy search equation mechanism is used to balance the exploration and development of the algorithm. In the following bee search phase, two kinds of neighborhood search operators are designed based on the problem characteristics to further improve the fitness values of the better solutions. In the scout bee search phase, a migration operator and an immigration operator are introduced to improve the fitness values of the worse solutions and promote the exchange of different subpopulations to achieve co-evolution. In the experimental part, orthogonal experimental design is used to determine the appropriate algorithm parameters. Simulation experiments are carried out to test problems of different sizes. The experimental results show that the proposed HDABC algorithm shows good performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据