3.8 Proceedings Paper

Semi-supervised vessel wall detection and segmentation from 3D femoral MR images

期刊

MEDICAL IMAGING 2023
卷 12464, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2654129

关键词

Arterial localization; Vessel wall segmentation; Semi-supervised segmentation; Pseudo-label

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed a semi-supervised artery localization and segmentation model that improves segmentation performance with the use of unlabeled image slices. The results show that the semi-supervised approach and the proposed continuity score independently improve femoral vessel wall segmentation.
Vessel wall volume (VWV) for the femoral arteries is a sensitive indicator of coexistent generalized atherosclerosis. Measuring VWV requires the segmentation of lumen and outer wall boundaries from 3D MR images. The main challenge for vessel wall segmentation is the small size of femoral artery in a 3D MR image and the existence of objects mimicking arteries. Besides, due to the long span of the femoral artery and time-consuming manual segmentation, a large number of image slices are not manually segmented, and therefore, cannot be used to train fully supervised methods. We proposed a semi-supervised end-to-end artery localization and segmentation model that improves segmentation performance through the use of axial image slices that are not manually segmented (unlabeled slices). The method localizes femoral arteries with bounding boxes and performs segmentation over the selected regions. A mean teacher framework was trained to generate high-quality segmentation for unlabeled slices, serving as pseudo-labels to improve the student model's performance in arterial detection and vessel wall segmentation. A new continuity score was developed to further improve the quality of the vessel wall segmentation on unlabeled image slices. Our experiments show that the semi-supervised approach and the proposed continuity score independently improve the femoral vessel wall segmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据