4.4 Article

The superficial branch of the radial nerve and sensory disturbance in the radial forearm flap donor-site

期刊

REGENERATIVE THERAPY
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 174-179

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2023.06.013

关键词

Radial forearm flap; Donor-site; Reconstructive surgery; Sensory disturbance; Superficial branch of the radial nerve

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study retrospectively investigated the relationship between the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) preservation method and post-operative sensation at the flap donor-site. The results showed that the zero preservation method had a higher risk of subjective symptoms and objective hypoesthesia development compared to the complete preservation method. Main trunk preservation prevented the development of subjective symptoms. Complete preservation is optimal for RF flap harvest, but main trunk preservation can be considered in cases of perforator crossing.
Introduction: Sensory disturbance due to injury of the superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN) is a donor-site morbidity of the radial forearm (RF) flap. The relationship between the SBRN preservation method and the post-operative sensation at the flap donor-site was retrospectively investigated. Methods: We included 39 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with a free RF flap at Hyogo Cancer Center between April 2014 and March 2018. The patients were classified into the following three groups according to the SBRN preservation method: group 1, zero preservation, excision of the entire SBRN; group 2, main trunk preservation, excision of all branches except the main trunk of the SBRN; and group 3, complete preservation, preservation of the entire SBRN. Objective sensations and subjective symptoms at the flap donor-site were analyzed. Results: The mean objective sensory scores were 3.18, 2.97, and 1.78 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 were significant (p = 0.0035 and p = 0.037, respectively). The mean subjective symptom scores were 2.40, 1.33, and 1.40 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Differences between groups 1 and 2, and between groups 1 and 3 were significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.019, respectively). Conclusions: Zero preservation method had a higher risk of subjective symptoms and objective hypoesthesia development at the flap donor-site than the complete preservation method. Despite inevitable objective hypoesthesia, the main trunk preservation prevented the development of subjective symptoms. Complete preservation is optimal for RF flap harvest; however, in case of perforator crossing, main trunk preservation is another option. & COPY; 2023, The Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据