4.5 Article

Outcome of Microscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery in Cushing Disease: A Case Series of 96 Patients

期刊

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 170-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.046

关键词

Cushing disease; Outcome; Recurrence; Remission; Transsphenoidal surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results of transsphenoidal surgery in patients with Cushing disease and outcome. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of the records of 96 patients with Cushing disease from 1997 to 2012. RESULTS: There were 73 females and 23 males, with a mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 3-13 years). The sex ratio was significantly different in children and teenagers versus adults. Magnetic resonance imaging showed microadenoroa, roacroadenoma, and no adenoma in 66, 18, and 12 patients, respectively, There was no surgical mortality. Early remission (normal 24-hour urinary free cortisol and basal serum cortisol <5 mu g/dL) was achieved in 94.8%. Regression analysis showed that only tumor size, cavernous sinus extension, and tumor consistency influenced remission. Recurrence was seen in 21.9%. Regression analysis showed that age, preoperative basal cortisol levels, and follow-up duration influenced recurrence. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant negative correlation between patient age and the follow-up period. After detection of recurrence, 17 patients underwent repeat transsphenoidal surgery that resulted in remission in 12 patients (70,6%). The other 5 patients were referred for gamma knife radiosurgery or bilateral adrenalectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Transsphenoidal surgery is a safe and highly efficient procedure in the treatment of Cushing disease, Macroadenomas, cavernous sinus invasion, and harder tumor consistencies, however, are associated with lower remission rates (higher disease persistence) and younger age, higher preoperative cortisol levels, and longer follow-up periods are associated with higher recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据