4.5 Article

Geometrically resilient digital watermarking scheme based on radial harmonic Fourier moments magnitude

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2014.10.012

关键词

Image watermarking; Geometrical transformations; Radial harmonic Fourier moments; Moment magnitude distribution; Adaptive quantization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472171, 61272416]
  2. Open Project Program of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Image and Video Understanding for Social Safety (Nanjing University of Science and Technology) [30920130122006]
  3. Open Foundation of Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Signal Processing [ZJKL_4_SP-OP2013-01]
  4. Open Foundation of Provincial Key Laboratory for Computer Information Processing Technology (Soochow University) [KJS1325]
  5. Open Project Program of the State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University [A1425]
  6. Liaoning Research Project for Institutions of Higher Education of China [L2013407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is still a challenging work to design a robust image watermarking scheme to resist geometrical transformations. In this paper, we analyze the geometric invariant properties of radial harmonic Fourier moments (RHFMs), and propose a new geometrically resilient digital image watermarking scheme based on RHFMs magnitudes. Firstly, the binary watermark image is encrypted by Arnold transform, and the RHFMs of the host image are computed. Then, the accurate and robust RHFMs are selected according to the moment magnitude distribution. Finally, the encrypted watermark is embedded by quantizing the magnitudes of the selected RHFMs, and the watermarked image is obtained by adding the compensation image to the original host image. Experimental results show that the proposed RHFMs based image watermarking scheme outperforms other moments based watermarking methods, and is robust to a wide range of attacks, e.g., median filtering, random noise addition, JPEG compression, rotation, and scaling, etc. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据