4.1 Review

Novel Insights into Microbial Behavior Gleaned Using Microfluidics

期刊

MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENTS
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

JAPANESE SOC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, DEPT BIORESOURCE SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME22089

关键词

microfluidics; biofilm; P; aeruginosa; S; mutans; L; cholodnii; filamentous fungi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microorganisms form communities in various environmental niches that are filled with micrometer-scale gaps and features. These microorganisms adapt to and are influenced by their physical environment. Conventional culture methods do not accurately mimic the complexity of natural micrometer-scale environments, hindering the study of their ecological behavior. Microfluidics has emerged as a valuable tool to study microorganisms, allowing the manipulation of micrometer-scale flows and real-time imaging. This review discusses insights into bacterial and fungal behavior obtained through microfluidics and explores its potential for further adoption.
Microorganisms develop into communities in nearly every environmental niche, which is typically replete with micrometer-scale gaps and features. In each of these habitats, microorganisms adapt to and are affected by their physical environment. Conventional culture methods use glass bottom dishes or millimeter-scale flow cells, which poorly mimic the complexity of natural micrometer-scale environments; therefore, the limitations associated with the creation of microbe-scale environments with granularity hinder the ability to examine their ecological behavior. Microfluidics is a tool that is increasingly being used to study microorganisms because it enables the manipulation of micrometer-scale flows while simultaneously facilitating real-time and live-cell imaging. In this review, we discuss several insights into the behavior of bacteria and fungi that were gained through the adoption of microfluidics to control complex micrometer-scale environments. We also discuss the potential of the increased adoption of this tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据