4.6 Article

Laryngeal mask airway in neonatal stabilization and transport: a retrospective study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05089-8

关键词

Laryngeal mask airway; Neonate; Transport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed the use of LMA during stabilization and transport in a large series of neonates. LMA use was rare but increasing over time, and showed some heterogeneity among referring centers. LMA was safe and lifesaving in cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate situations.
Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) may be considered by health caregivers of level I-II hospitals for neonatal resuscitation and stabilization before and during interhospital care, but literature provides little information on this aspect. This study reviewed the use of LMA during stabilization and transport in a large series of neonates. This is a retrospective study evaluating the use of LMA in infants who underwent emergency transport by the Eastern Veneto Neonatal Emergency Transport Service between January 2003 and December 2021. All data were obtained from transport registry, transport forms, and hospital charts. In total, 64/3252 transferred neonates (2%) received positive pressure ventilation with an LMA, with increasing trend over time (p = 0.001). Most of these neonates were transferred after birth (97%), due to a respiratory or neurologic disease (95%). LMA was used before the transport (n = 60), during the transport (n = 1), or both (n = 3). No device-related adverse effects were recorded. Sixty-one neonates (95%) survived and were discharged/transferred from the receiving center. Conclusion: In a large series of transferred neonates, LMA use during stabilization and transport was rare but increasing over time, and showed some heterogeneity among referring centers. In our series, LMA was safe and lifesaving in cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate situations. Future prospective, multicenter research may provide detailed insights on LMA use in neonates needing postnatal transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据