4.5 Review

Aberrant T cell immunity triggered by human Respiratory Syncytial Virus and human Metapneumovirus infection

期刊

VIRULENCE
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 685-704

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1265725

关键词

adaptive immunity; hMPV; hRSV; immunological synapse; T cells

资金

  1. National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (FONDECYT) program, Ministry of Education [1158262, 3150559]
  2. Fund for the Promotion of Scientific and Technological Development (FONDEF), Ministry of Education, Chile [D11/1080]
  3. Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Ministry of Economy, Chile [P09/P016-F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human Respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) are the two major etiological viral agents of lower respiratory tract diseases, affecting mainly infants, young children and the elderly. Although the infection of both viruses trigger an antiviral immune response that mediate viral clearance and disease resolution in immunocompetent individuals, the promotion of long-term immunity appears to be deficient and reinfection are common throughout life. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that hRSV and hMPV, can induce aberrant T cell responses, which leads to exacerbated lung inflammation and poor T and B cell memory immunity. The modulation of immune response exerted by both viruses include different strategies such as, impairment of immunological synapse mediated by viral proteins or soluble factors, and the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells, among others. All these viral strategies contribute to the alteration of the adaptive immunity in order to increase the susceptibility to reinfections. In this review, we discuss current research related to the mechanisms underlying the impairment of T and B cell immune responses induced by hRSV and hMPV infection. In addition, we described the role each virulence factor involved in immune modulation caused by these viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据