4.6 Article

Superhard bulk C4N3 compounds with metal-free magnetism assembled from two-dimensional C4N3: a first-principles study

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 32, 页码 21408-21415

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp01619f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a series of C4N3 compounds were designed using first-principles calculations. The ABC-stacked compound exhibits antiferromagnetic ordering and has a hardness of 54.0 GPa, while being a semiconductor. This work opens a potential way to design magnetic superhard materials and has attracted attention in the field of spintronics.
Enriching the electronic properties of superhard materials is very important to extend their applications, and some superhard materials with metallic or superconducting characteristics have been designed via theoretical or experimental methods. However, their magnetic features have scarcely been studied, since most of them are limited to nonmagnetic ordering. Here, with the help of first-principles calculations, a series of C4N3 compounds are designed by stacking C4N3 sheets with different sequences. As expected, some of them exhibit both magnetic and superhard characteristics. Notably, all these compounds exhibit dynamic and mechanical stabilities, indicating that their dynamic and mechanical stabilities are independent of the stacking sequence. Among them, the ABC-stacked one is energetically favorable, and it exhibits antiferromagnetic ordering and has a hardness of & SIM;54.0 GPa, and the electronic calculations show that it is a semiconductor with a direct band gap of & SIM;1.20 eV. Besides, the magnetism of all magnetic C4N3 compounds is caused by the lower coordinated atoms, and the magnetic moments are located on three-fold C or two-fold coordinated N atoms. Additionally, the magnetic property is deeply dependent on the external pressure. This work opens a potential way to design magnetic superhard materials and can arouse their applications in the spintronic field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据